Frases de Simon Kuznets

Simon Smith Kuznets foi um economista russo naturalizado estadunidense.

Recebeu o Prémio de Ciências Económicas em Memória de Alfred Nobel de 1971. O prêmio foi recebido pela sua famosa "curva de Kuznets", que relaciona 'Desigualdade de Renda' ao 'Crescimento do Produto' de uma Economia. O gráfico se assemelha a uma parábola com concavidade para baixo, ou seja, nos estágios iniciais do crescimento econômico de um países a desigualdade vai aumentar. Isso acontece porque nessa fase do crescimento vai ocorrer um aumento grande da demanda por mão de obra qualificada, elevando os salários dos trabalhadores qualificados em detrimento dos não qualificados. A medida que o desenvolvimento econômico do país progride vai haver ganhos de educação e as pessoas irão buscar mais qualificação, logo a proporção de MDO qualificada/MDO não qualificada vai aumentar, reduzindo a desigualdade de renda.

Em 1991 se popularizou a "curva ambiental de Kuznets", a qual relaciona Impactos Ambientais vs. Renda per capita das sociedades. O gráfico também se assemelha a uma parábola com concavidade para baixo, ou seja, os danos ambientais provocados por sociedades pobres e ricas seriam baixos, enquanto aqueles provocados pelas sociedades intermediárias, em desenvolvimento, seriam altos. A curva recebeu posteriormente críticas severas, haja vista que, por exemplo, no caso de emissões de gás carbônico, em um gráfico Emissão vs. Renda per capita fica bem claro que o crescimento de emissão de tal gás é quase sempre acompanhado pelo aumento da renda. Wikipedia  

✵ 30. Abril 1901 – 8. Julho 1985
Simon Kuznets photo
Simon Kuznets: 11   citações 0   Curtidas

Simon Kuznets: Frases em inglês

“The paper is perhaps 5 per cent empirical information and 95 per cent speculation, some of it possibly tainted by wishful thinking.”

Fonte: "Economic growth and income inequality," 1955, p. 26
Contexto: The paper is perhaps 5 per cent empirical information and 95 per cent speculation, some of it possibly tainted by wishful thinking. The excuse for building an elaborate structure on such a shaky foundation is a deep interest in the subject and a wish to share it with members of the Association. The formal and no less genuine excuse is that the subject is central to much of economic analysis and thinking; that our knowledge of it is inadequate; that a more cogent view of the whole field may help channel our interests and work in intellectually profitable directions; that speculation is an effective way of presenting a broad view of the field; and that so long as it is recognized as a collection of hunches calling for further investigation rather than a set of fully tested conclusions, little harm and much good may result

“[An] epochal innovation [consisting of the] spreading application of science to processes of production and social organization.”

Fonte: Modern economic growth,(1966), p. 487, as cited in: Peter Temin, ‎Gianni Toniolo (2008) The World Economy between the Wars. p. 7

“The welfare of a nation can scarcely be inferred from a measurement of national income.”

Simon Kuznets in report to the Congress, 1934; Cited in: Gernot Kohler, ‎Emilio José Chaves (2003) Globalization: Critical Perspectives. p. 336

“we need far more empirical study than we have had so far of the universe of inventors; any finding concerning inventors… would be of great value… for public policy in regard to inventive activity.”

Simon Kuznets (1962, p. 32), as cited in: David W. Galenson, "Understanding the Creativity of Scientists and Entrepreneurs." (2012).

“An invariable accompaniment of growth in developed countries is the shift away from agriculture, a process usually referred to as industrialization and urbanization. The income distribution of the total population, in the simplest model, may therefore be viewed as a combination of the income distributions of the rural and of the urban populations. What little we know of the structures of these two component income distributions reveals that: (a) the average per capita income of the rural population is usually lower than that of the urban;' (b) inequality in the percentage shares within the distribution for the rural population is somewhat narrower than in that for the urban population… Operating with this simple model, what conclusions do we reach? First, all other conditions being equal, the increasing weight of urban population means an increasing share for the more unequal of the two component distributions. Second, the relative difference in per capita income between the rural and urban populations does not necessarily drift downward in the process of economic growth: indeed, there is some evidence to suggest that it is stable at best, and tends to widen because per capita productivity in urban pursuits increases more rapidly than in agriculture. If this is so, inequality in the total income distribution should increase”

Fonte: "Economic growth and income inequality," 1955, p. 7 as cited in: Anthony Barnes Atkinson, François Bourguignon, Handbook of Income Distribution, Vol. 1. Elsevier, 2000 p. 799

“[The principal characteristic of this economic epoch is] a sustained increase in per capita or per worker product, most often accompanied by an increase in population and usually sweeping structural changes.”

Fonte: Modern economic growth,(1966), p. 1, as cited in: Amitava Krishna Dutt, ‎Jaime Ros (2008) International Handbook of Development Economics. p. 48; Definition of "modern economic growth"