„If we command our wealth, we shall be rich and free; if our wealth commands us, we are poor indeed.“
— Edmund Burke Anglo-Irish statesman 1729 - 1797
— Edmund Burke Anglo-Irish statesman 1729 - 1797
— Thomas Paine English and American political activist 1737 - 1809
Context: It is from a strange mixture of tyranny and cowardice that exclusions have been set up and continued. The boldness to do wrong at first, changes afterwards into cowardly craft, and at last into fear. The Representatives in England appear now to act as if they were afraid to do right, even in part, lest it should awaken the nation to a sense of all the wrongs it has endured. This case serves to shew that the same conduct that best constitutes the safety of an individual, namely, a strict adherence to principle, constitutes also the safety of a Government, and that without it safety is but an empty name. When the rich plunder the poor of his rights, it becomes an example of the poor to plunder the rich of his property, for the rights of the one are as much property to him as wealth is property to the other and the little all is as dear as the much. It is only by setting out on just principles that men are trained to be just to each other; and it will always be found, that when the rich protect the rights of the poor, the poor will protect the property of the rich. But the guarantee, to be effectual, must be parliamentarily reciprocal.
— Martin Scorsese American film director, screenwriter, producer and actor 1942
"The Film Foundation Main page".
— Walter Rauschenbusch United States Baptist theologian 1861 - 1918
— Alex Salmond Scottish National Party politician and former First Minister of Scotland 1954
— Calvin Coolidge American politician, 30th president of the United States (in office from 1923 to 1929) 1872 - 1933
— Douglass C. North American Economist 1920 - 2015
— Joseph Chamberlain British businessman, politician, and statesman 1836 - 1914
Speech on 8 September, 1885.<!-- published/quoted where? -->
— Viktor Schauberger austrian philosopher and inventor 1885 - 1958
— Dan Savage American sex advice columnist and gay rights campaigner 1964
— Margaret Thatcher British stateswoman and politician 1925 - 2013
Speech to Conservative Women’s Conference (20 May 1981) https://www.margaretthatcher.org/document/104653
— Michele Bachmann American politician 1956
Edwatch conference, October 10-11, 2003 on Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty's "Tax-Free Zones" initiative
— John Muir Scottish-born American naturalist and author 1838 - 1914
Terry Gifford, LLO, page 693
— Ronald Reagan American politician, 40th president of the United States (in office from 1981 to 1989) 1911 - 2004
Context: We are a nation that has a government — not the other way around. And this makes us special among the nations of the Earth. Our Government has no power except that granted it by the people. It is time to check and reverse the growth of government which shows signs of having grown beyond the consent of the governed. It is my intention to curb the size and influence of the Federal establishment and to demand recognition of the distinction between the powers granted to the Federal Government and those reserved to the States or to the people. All of us need to be reminded that the Federal Government did not create the States; the States created the Federal Government. Now, so there will be no misunderstanding, it is not my intention to do away with government. It is, rather, to make it work-work with us, not over us; to stand by our side, not ride on our back. Government can and must provide opportunity, not smother it; foster productivity, not stifle it.
— Lawrence Lessig American academic, political activist. 1961
Context: Common sense is with the copyright warriors because the debate so far has been framed at the extremes — as a grand either/or: either property or anarchy, either total control or artists won't be paid. If that really is the choice, then the warriors should win. The mistake here is the error of the excluded middle. There are extremes in this debate, but the extremes are not all that there is. There are those who believe in maximal copyright — "All Rights Reserved" — and those who reject copyright — "No Rights Reserved." The "All Rights Reserved" sorts believe that you should ask permission before you "use" a copyrighted work in any way. The "No Rights Reserved" sorts believe you should be able to do with content as you wish, regardless of whether you have permission or not.... What's needed is a way to say something in the middle — neither "all rights reserved" nor "no rights reserved" but "some rights reserved" — and thus a way to respect copyrights but enable creators to free content as they see fit. In other words, we need a way to restore a set of freedoms that we could just take for granted before.